Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TA0738

    Case T-738/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — STIF-IDF v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the STIF-IDF — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Advantage — Offsetting of costs involved in the discharging of public service obligations — Article 107(1), TFEU — Obligation to state reasons)

    OJ C 328, 30.9.2019, p. 45–45 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.9.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 328/45


    Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — STIF-IDF v Commission

    (Case T-738/17) (1)

    (State aid - Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 - Investment subsidies awarded by the STIF-IDF - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Advantage - Offsetting of costs involved in the discharging of public service obligations - Article 107(1), TFEU - Obligation to state reasons)

    (2019/C 328/49)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Syndicat Transport Île de France (STIF-IDF) (Paris, France) (represented by: B. Le Bret and C. Rydzynski, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1470 of 2 February 2017 on State aid schemes SA.26763 2014/C (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of bus transport undertakings in the Île-de-France Region (OJ 2017 L 209, p. 24).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the application.

    2.

    Orders Syndicat Transport Île de France (STIF-IDF) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.


    (1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.


    Top