This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TB0687(01)
Case T-687/18: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Limited communication with the ECB — Procedural defects — Intermediary or preparatory measures — Rights of defence — Inadmissibility)
Case T-687/18: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Limited communication with the ECB — Procedural defects — Intermediary or preparatory measures — Rights of defence — Inadmissibility)
Case T-687/18: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Limited communication with the ECB — Procedural defects — Intermediary or preparatory measures — Rights of defence — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 328, 30.9.2019, p. 56–57
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.9.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 328/56 |
Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB
(Case T-687/18) (1)
(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority - Appointment of a contact person - Limited communication with the ECB - Procedural defects - Intermediary or preparatory measures - Rights of defence - Inadmissibility)
(2019/C 328/64)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pilatus Bank plc (Ta’Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: O. Behrends, M. Kirchner and L. Feddern, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Yoo, M. Puidokas and A. Karpf, Agents)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the ECB’s email of 10 September 2018 in so far as, by that email, the ECB requested the applicant to direct its communications via the Competent Person appointed under Maltese law or with the Competent Person’s approval.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as being inadmissible; |
2. |
Pilatus Bank plc shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |