Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TA0796

    Case T-796/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Mouldpro v EUIPO — Wenz Kunststoff (MOULDPRO) [EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MOULDPRO — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative grounds for invalidity — Article 60(1)(b) and Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001]

    OJ C 122, 1.4.2019, p. 17–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.4.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 122/17


    Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Mouldpro v EUIPO — Wenz Kunststoff (MOULDPRO)

    (Case T-796/17) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark MOULDPRO - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Relative grounds for invalidity - Article 60(1)(b) and Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001)

    (2019/C 122/19)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Mouldpro ApS (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: W Rebernik, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG (Lüdenscheid, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 October 2017 (Case R 2153/2015-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mouldpro and Wenz Kunststoff.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Mouldpro ApS to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.


    Top