Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TB0812

    Case T-812/17 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — Seco Belgium and Vinçotte v Parliament (Interim measures — Public procurement — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Withdrawal of the contested act — No need to adjudicate in part — Application for an injunction — No urgency)

    OJ C 104, 19.3.2018, p. 42–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.3.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 104/42

    Order of the President of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — Seco Belgium and Vinçotte v Parliament

    (Case T-812/17 R)

    ((Interim measures - Public procurement - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Withdrawal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate in part - Application for an injunction - No urgency))

    (2018/C 104/55)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicants: Seco Belgium (Brussels, Belgium) Vinçotte (Vilvoorde, Belgium) (represented by: A. Delvaux and R. Simar, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: P. López-Carceller and Z. Nagy, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, first, for a suspension of the operation of the decision of the Parliament of 1 December 2017 to reject the applicants’ tender in the tender procedure 06D 20/2017/M005 entitled ‘Assignments to perform inspections and provide technical opinions in the context of construction works, projects and purchases at the European Parliament in Brussels’ and to award the contract to another tenderer, and secondly, for an injunction against the Parliament.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    There is no need to adjudicate on the application for a suspension of the operation of the decision of the Parliament of 1 December 2017 to reject the tender of Seco Belgium and Vinçotte in the tender procedure 06D 20/2017/M005 entitled ‘Assignments to perform inspections and provide technical opinions in the context of construction works, projects and purchases at the European Parliament in Brussels’ and to award the contract to another tenderer.

    2.

    The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder.

    3.

    The order of 21 December 2017, Seco Belgium and Vinçotte v Parliament (T-812/17 R), is set aside.

    4.

    The costs are reserved.
    Top