Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TB0021

    Case T-21/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Reduction in financial aid — Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action manifestly well founded)

    OJ C 392, 20.11.2017, p. 27–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.11.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 392/27


    Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission

    (Case T-21/10) (1)

    ((Action for annulment - ERDF - Reduction in financial aid - Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action manifestly well founded))

    (2017/C 392/33)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by: J. Möller, T. Henze and C. Blaschke, and subsequently by: J. Möller and T. Henze, acting as Agents, and C. von Donat, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann, B. Conte and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9049 of 13 November 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Single Programming Document Objective 2 Saarland (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1123 of 7 May 1997.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    Commission Decision C(2009) 9049 of 13 November 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Single Programming Document Objective 2 Saarland (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1123 of 7 May 1997 is annulled.

    2.

    The European Commission shall pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.


    Top