Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CA0351

    Case C-351/15 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 January 2017 — European Commission v Total SA, Elf Aquitaine SA (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for methacrylates — Fines — Joint and several liability of parent companies and their subsidiary for the latter’s unlawful conduct — Payment of the fine by the subsidiary — Reduction of the amount of the subsidiary’s fine following a judgment of the General Court of the European Union — Letters from the accountant of the European Commission demanding payment by the parent companies of the amount it repaid to the subsidiary plus default interest — Action for annulment — Challengeable acts — Effective judicial protection)

    OJ C 70, 6.3.2017, p. 4–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.3.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 70/4


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 January 2017 — European Commission v Total SA, Elf Aquitaine SA

    (Case C-351/15 P) (1)

    ((Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for methacrylates - Fines - Joint and several liability of parent companies and their subsidiary for the latter’s unlawful conduct - Payment of the fine by the subsidiary - Reduction of the amount of the subsidiary’s fine following a judgment of the General Court of the European Union - Letters from the accountant of the European Commission demanding payment by the parent companies of the amount it repaid to the subsidiary plus default interest - Action for annulment - Challengeable acts - Effective judicial protection))

    (2017/C 070/05)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Appellant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and F. Dintilhac, acting as Agents)

    Other parties to the proceedings: Total SA, Elf Aquitaine SA (represented by: E. Morgan de Rivery and E. Lagathu, lawyers)

    Intervener in support of the applicant: EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: C. Perrin, acting as Agent)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA;

    3.

    Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.


    Top