This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TA0284
Case T-284/12: Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Oro Clean Chemie v OHIM (PROSEPT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PROSEPT — Earlier national word mark Pursept — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rights of defence — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-284/12: Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Oro Clean Chemie v OHIM (PROSEPT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PROSEPT — Earlier national word mark Pursept — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rights of defence — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-284/12: Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Oro Clean Chemie v OHIM (PROSEPT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PROSEPT — Earlier national word mark Pursept — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rights of defence — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 20–20
(HR)
|
16.11.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 336/21 |
Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Oro Clean Chemie v OHIM (PROSEPT)
(Case T-284/12) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PROSEPT - Earlier national word mark Pursept - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rights of defence - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
2013/C 336/41
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Oro Clean Chemie AG (Fehraltorf, Switzerland) (represented by: F. Ekey, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)
Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Merz Pharma GmbH & Co. KGaA (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Hirsch and C. Mayerhöffer, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 March 2012 (Case R 1053/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Merz Pharma GmbH & Co. KGaA and Oro Clean Chemie AG.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Oro Clean Chemie AG to pay the costs. |