EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011FB0109
Case F-109/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — Lebedef v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appraisal procedure for 2009 — Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation — Staff report covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned — Designation under the Staff Regulations — Designation for union purposes — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case F-109/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — Lebedef v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appraisal procedure for 2009 — Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation — Staff report covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned — Designation under the Staff Regulations — Designation for union purposes — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case F-109/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — Lebedef v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appraisal procedure for 2009 — Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation — Staff report covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned — Designation under the Staff Regulations — Designation for union purposes — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 38, 9.2.2013, p. 32–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.2.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 38/32 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — Lebedef v Commission
(Case F-109/11) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Appraisal procedure for 2009 - Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation - Staff report covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned - Designation under the Staff Regulations - Designation for union purposes - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
2013/C 38/63
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the applicant’s staff report for the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2009.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
2. |
Mr Lebedef must bear her own costs and is ordered pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |