Vælg de eksperimentelle funktioner, som du ønsker at prøve

Dette dokument er et uddrag fra EUR-Lex

Dokument 62011CN0227

    Case C-227/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands) lodged on 16 May 2011 — DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat

    OJ C 226, 30.7.2011, s. 12–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.7.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 226/12


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands) lodged on 16 May 2011 — DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat

    (Case C-227/11)

    2011/C 226/23

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Rechtbank Haarlem

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV

    Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must the active network analysers [of the type J6801B] be classified under heading 9030 40 or under heading 9031 80?

    2.

    Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 129/2005 (1) of 20 January 2005 … invalid because in that regulation the Commission incorrectly classified the network analysers mentioned in points 3 and 4, namely, under CN code 9031 80 39, instead of under code 9030 40?


    (1)  Concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature and amending Regulation (EC) No 955/98 (OJ 2005 L 25, p. 37).


    Op