Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009FA0043

Case F-43/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — van Heuckelom v European Police Office (Europol) (Civil Service — Staff Regulations of Europol — Article 29 — Advancement in step granted on the basis of staff reports — Plea of illegality of the decision establishing the policy for determining grades and steps — Respective powers of Europol’s Director and Management Board — Europol’s Director’s discretion — Limits)

OJ C 317, 20.11.2010, p. 47–47 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20.11.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/47


Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — van Heuckelom v European Police Office (Europol)

(Case F-43/09) (1)

(Civil Service - Staff Regulations of Europol - Article 29 - Advancement in step granted on the basis of staff reports - Plea of illegality of the decision establishing the policy for determining grades and steps - Respective powers of Europol’s Director and Management Board - Europol’s Director’s discretion - Limits)

2010/C 317/82

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Carlo van Heuckelom (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: W.J. Dammingh and N.D.Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents, assisted initially by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers, then by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 14 July 2008 awarding the applicant a single step of classification in grade and of the decision of 19 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.

Dismisses Mr. van Heuckelom’s action;

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 180, 01/08/2009, p. 63.


Top