Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TB0440(02)

    Case T-440/07, T-465/07 and T-1/08: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Huta Buczek and Others v Commission (No need to adjudicate)

    OJ C 260, 25.9.2010, p. 14–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.9.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 260/14


    Order of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Huta Buczek and Others v Commission

    (Case T-440/07, T-465/07 and T-1/08) (1)

    (No need to adjudicate)

    2010/C 260/18

    Language of the case: Polish

    Parties

    Applicants: Huta Buczek Sp. z o.o. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: D. Szlachetko-Reiter, lawyer) (Case T-440/07); Emilian Salej, acting as liquidator of Technologie Buczek S.A. (Laryszów, Poland); Technologie Buczek S.A. (Sosnowiec) (represented by: D. Szlachetko-Reiter, lawyer) (Case T-465/07); and Buczek Automotive Sp z o.o. (Sosnowiec) (represented by: T. Gackowski initially, then D. Szlachetko-Reiter and finally J. Jurczyk, lawyers) (Case T-1/08)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Gross, M. Kaduczak, A. Stobiecka-Kuik and K. Herrmann, Agents)

    Intervener in support of the applicants: Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Niechciał initially, then M. Krasnodebska-Tomkiel and M. Rzotkiewicz, Agents) (Cases T-440/07 and T-1/08).

    Re:

    Applications for partial annulment of the Commission Decision C(2007) 5087 final of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    There is no further need to adjudicate on the application in Case T-465/07, as brought by Emilian Salej.

    2.

    The parties are to bear their own costs relating to Case T-465/07, as brought by Emilian Salej.


    (1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.


    Top