This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TA0464
Case T-464/08: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Zeta Europe v OHIM (Superleggera) (Community trade mark — Application for the figurative Community trade mark Superleggera — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
Case T-464/08: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Zeta Europe v OHIM (Superleggera) (Community trade mark — Application for the figurative Community trade mark Superleggera — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
Case T-464/08: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Zeta Europe v OHIM (Superleggera) (Community trade mark — Application for the figurative Community trade mark Superleggera — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
OJ C 179, 3.7.2010, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.7.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 179/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Zeta Europe v OHIM (Superleggera)
(Case T-464/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Application for the figurative Community trade mark Superleggera - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Examination of the facts of its own motion - Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2010/C 179/62)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Zeta Europe BV (Arnhem, Netherlands) (represented by: V. Bilardo, C. Bacchini and M. Mazzitelli, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Sempio and O. Montalto, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2008 (Case R 666/2008-1), concerning an application for the registration of the figurative sign Superleggera as a Community trade mark
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Zeta Europe BV to pay the costs. |