This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/224/78
Case T-165/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 — Vounakis v Commission (Officials — Career development review — 2001/2002 assessment exercise — Incompetence of the appeal assessor — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons)
Case T-165/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 — Vounakis v Commission (Officials — Career development review — 2001/2002 assessment exercise — Incompetence of the appeal assessor — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons)
Case T-165/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 — Vounakis v Commission (Officials — Career development review — 2001/2002 assessment exercise — Incompetence of the appeal assessor — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons)
OJ C 224, 16.9.2006, p. 36–36
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.9.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 224/36 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 — Vounakis v Commission
(Case T-165/04) (1)
(Officials - Career development review - 2001/2002 assessment exercise - Incompetence of the appeal assessor - Manifest error of assessment - Duty to state reasons)
(2006/C 224/78)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Hippocrate Vounakis (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision of 23 May 2003 establishing the applicant's career development review for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of 23 May 2003 establishing the applicant's career development review for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002 in so far as it concerns the section ‘Conduct in the service’; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
|
3. |
Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and one third of those incurred by the applicant; |
|
4. |
Orders the applicant to bear two thirds of his own costs. |