Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023CN0374

    Case C-374/23, Adoreikė: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 13 June 2023 — SR, RB v Lietuvos Respublika

    OJ C 304, 28.8.2023, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    13/06/2023
    Date lodged:
    13/06/2023
    Author:
    Court of Justice
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    Lithuanian
    Type of procedure:
    Reference for a preliminary ruling
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    • Submits a preliminary question about 12016M002
    • Submits a preliminary question about 12016M019 paragraph 1 unnumbered paragraph 2
    • Submits a preliminary question about 12016P047
    Link

    28.8.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 304/11

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 13 June 2023 — SR, RB v Lietuvos Respublika

    (Case C-374/23, Adoreikė (1))

    (2023/C 304/14)

    Language of the case: Lithuanian

    Referring court

    Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: SR, RB

    Defendant: Lietuvos Respublika

    Questions referred

    1.

    Are the values of democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and justice, enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, to be interpreted as conferring on the legislative and executive powers of the Member States the unrestricted and exclusive discretion to set, by means of national legislation, the remuneration of judges at a rate that depends solely on the will of the legislative and executive powers?

    2.

    Are the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, as well as those of Article 47 of the Charter [of Fundamental Rights of the European Union], which covers, inter alia, the independence of the judiciary, to be interpreted as permitting the Member States to introduce, by means of national legislation, rules which set the remuneration of judges below the remuneration or fees set by the State in respect of members of other legal professions?

    (1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

    Top