This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0488
Case C-488/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 July 2022 by KQ against the order of the General Court (President) delivered on 19 May 2022 in Case T-122/22 AJ, KQ v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo
Case C-488/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 July 2022 by KQ against the order of the General Court (President) delivered on 19 May 2022 in Case T-122/22 AJ, KQ v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo
Case C-488/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 July 2022 by KQ against the order of the General Court (President) delivered on 19 May 2022 in Case T-122/22 AJ, KQ v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo
OJ C 179, 22.5.2023, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 18/07/2022
- Date lodged:
- 18/07/2022
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Application for legal aid, Appeal
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
22.5.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 179/12 |
Appeal brought on 18 July 2022 by KQ against the order of the General Court (President) delivered on 19 May 2022 in Case T-122/22 AJ, KQ v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo
(Case C-488/22 P)
(2023/C 179/18)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: KQ (represented by: P. Koutrakos, dikigoros, F. Randolph, advocaat, and J. Stojsavljevic-Savic, Solicitor)
Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Eulex Kosovo
By order of 31 March 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was dismissed due to a manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court and that KQ should bear her own costs.
