This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0366
Case T-366/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2023 — Coinbase v EUIPO — bitFlyer (coinbase) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark coinbase — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-366/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2023 — Coinbase v EUIPO — bitFlyer (coinbase) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark coinbase — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-366/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2023 — Coinbase v EUIPO — bitFlyer (coinbase) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark coinbase — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 179, 22.5.2023, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/03/2023
- Date lodged:
- 29/06/2021
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62021TJ0366
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
22.5.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 179/29 |
Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2023 — Coinbase v EUIPO — bitFlyer (coinbase)
(Case T-366/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark coinbase - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2023/C 179/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Coinbase, Inc. (Oakland, California, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: bitFlyer Inc. (Tokyo, Japan)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 April 2021 (Case R 1751/2020-4).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 April 2021 (Case R 1751/2020-4); |
|
2. |
Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
