This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CN0538
Case C-538/17 P: Appeal brought on 13 September 2017 by Thomas Murphy against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 4 July 2017 in Case T-90/16: Murphy v EUIPO
Case C-538/17 P: Appeal brought on 13 September 2017 by Thomas Murphy against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 4 July 2017 in Case T-90/16: Murphy v EUIPO
Case C-538/17 P: Appeal brought on 13 September 2017 by Thomas Murphy against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 4 July 2017 in Case T-90/16: Murphy v EUIPO
OJ C 104, 19.3.2018, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 13/09/2017
- Date lodged:
- 13/09/2017
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Appeal, Action for annulment
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Request to review the judgment 62016TJ0090
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
19.3.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 104/11 |
Appeal brought on 13 September 2017 by Thomas Murphy against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 4 July 2017 in Case T-90/16: Murphy v EUIPO
(Case C-538/17 P)
(2018/C 104/13)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Thomas Murphy (represented by: N. Travers SC, J. Gormley, BL, M. O’Connor, Solicitor)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Nike Innovate CV
By order of 30 January 2018 the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
