Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62016TN0664

Case T-664/16: Action brought on 14 September 2016 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi)

OJ C 70, 6.3.2017, p. 22–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
14/09/2016
Date lodged:
14/09/2016
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
German
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment

6.3.2017   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/22

Action brought on 14 September 2016 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi)

(Case T-664/16)

(2017/C 070/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: PJ (represented by: B. Schürmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the mark at issue: Applicant

Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Erdmann & Rossi’ — EU trade mark No 10 310 481

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2016 in Case R 1670/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the invalidity proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the Cancellation Division.

Pleas in law

—

infringement of Articles 52, 56, 63, 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009

—

infringement of Rules 50, 55 and 94 of Regulation No 2868/95;

—

infringement of Article 12 of Regulation No 216/96;

—

infringement of Article 6 ECHR;

—

infringement of Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Top