Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TN0346

    Case T-346/16: Action brought on 28 June 2016 — CSL Behring v EUIPO — Vivatrex (Vivatrex)

    OJ C 305, 22.8.2016, p. 47–48 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    28/06/2016
    Date lodged:
    28/06/2016
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    22.8.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 305/47

    Action brought on 28 June 2016 — CSL Behring v EUIPO — Vivatrex (Vivatrex)

    (Case T-346/16)

    (2016/C 305/64)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: CSL Behring AG (Bern, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vivatrex GmbH (Aachen, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘VIVATREX’ — Application for registration No 11 677 788

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2016 in joined Cases R 1263/2015-4 and R 1221/2015-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision in its entirety and annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 30 April 2015 given in opposition proceeding No B 2 241 613 insofar as it rejected the opposition;

    —

    uphold opposition No B 2 241 613 in its entirety;

    —

    order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top