This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0742
Case T-742/15 P: Appeal brought on 16 December 2015 by DD against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 October 2015 in Joined Cases F-106/13 and F-25/14 DD v FRA
Case T-742/15 P: Appeal brought on 16 December 2015 by DD against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 October 2015 in Joined Cases F-106/13 and F-25/14 DD v FRA
Case T-742/15 P: Appeal brought on 16 December 2015 by DD against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 October 2015 in Joined Cases F-106/13 and F-25/14 DD v FRA
OJ C 111, 29.3.2016, p. 26–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.3.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 111/26 |
Appeal brought on 16 December 2015 by DD against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 October 2015 in Joined Cases F-106/13 and F-25/14 DD v FRA
(Case T-742/15 P)
(2016/C 111/32)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: DD (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
Form of order sought by the appellant
The appellant claims that the Court should:
— |
partly set aside the judgment in joint cases F-106/13 and F-25/14 of 8 October 2015; |
— |
consequently:
|
— |
order the FRA to pay all costs related to this appeal |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the Civil Service Tribunal committed errors of law when examining only the procedural plea of absence of hearing which led to the annulment of both the decision of reprimand and of termination of contract, and refusing to examine all other pleas submitted in the application at first instance. The appellant submits that the Civil Service Tribunal committed an error of law and an incomplete examination of the facts, a violation of Article 47 of the Charter of fundamental rights and a violation of the duty to state reasons, a violation of the principle of a good administration of justice, a violation of the principle of legitimate expectations and a manifest error of assessment. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the Civil Service Tribunal committed errors of law when rejecting the appellant’s claims for non-material damages both with regard to the decision of reprimand and the decision of termination of contract.
|
(1) Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (OJ 2000 L 180, p. 22).