This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007CN0553
Case C-553/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 12 December 2007 — College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam v M.E.E. Rijkeboer
Case C-553/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 12 December 2007 — College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam v M.E.E. Rijkeboer
Case C-553/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 12 December 2007 — College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam v M.E.E. Rijkeboer
OJ C 64, 8.3.2008, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 12/12/2007
- Date lodged:
- 12/12/2007
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Dutch
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 31995L0045R(05) article 12 sentence 1
- request for interpretation 31995L0046 article 12 PT A)
- request for interpretation 31995L0046 article 6.1 PT E)
- Link
|
8.3.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 64/20 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 12 December 2007 — College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam v M.E.E. Rijkeboer
(Case C-553/07)
(2008/C 64/29)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Raad van State
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam
Respondent: M.E.E. Rijkeboer
Question referred
Is the restriction, provided for in the Netherlands Law on local-authority personal records, on the communication of data to one year prior to the relevant request compatible with Article 12(a) of Directive 95/46/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, whether or not read in conjunction with Article 6(1)(e) of that directive and the principle of proportionality?
