Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62005TA0412

Case T-412/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 2008 — M v Ombudsman (Non-contractual liability — Decision by the Commission to take no action on a complaint calling into question the conduct of a Member State — Decision by the European Ombudsman concerning the handling of the complaint — Errors made by the Commission in its finding of instances of maladministration — Naming of the applicant — Infringement of the right to respect for private life, and of the principles of proportionality and the right to be heard — Non-material damage — Causal link)

OJ C 285, 8.11.2008, pp. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

8.11.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/35


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 2008 — M v Ombudsman

(Case T-412/05) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Decision by the Commission to take no action on a complaint calling into question the conduct of a Member State - Decision by the European Ombudsman concerning the handling of the complaint - Errors made by the Commission in its finding of instances of maladministration - Naming of the applicant - Infringement of the right to respect for private life, and of the principles of proportionality and the right to be heard - Non-material damage - Causal link)

(2008/C 285/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: M (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by G. Vandersanden and A. Kalogeropoulos, then by A. Kalogeropoulos and L. Levi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Ombudsman (represented by: J. Sant'Anna and G. Grill, Agents)

Re:

Action under the second paragraph of Article 288 EC for compensation for damage suffered by the applicant as a result of being named in the decision of the European Ombudsman of 18 July 2002 concerning the complaint registered with the reference 1288/99/OV and as a result of the negligent conduct of the Ombudsman concerning the investigation of that complaint and the conclusions he reached in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Orders the European Ombudsman to pay Mr M compensation of EUR 10 000;

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.


Top