This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0817
Case T-817/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO — OmniVision (Hydrovision) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Hydrovision — Earlier EU word mark Hylo-Vision — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-817/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO — OmniVision (Hydrovision) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Hydrovision — Earlier EU word mark Hylo-Vision — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-817/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO — OmniVision (Hydrovision) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Hydrovision — Earlier EU word mark Hylo-Vision — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 88, 15.3.2021, pp. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.3.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 88/28 |
Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO — OmniVision (Hydrovision)
(Case T-817/19) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Hydrovision - Earlier EU word mark Hylo-Vision - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 88/36)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. (Dębica, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: OmniVision GmbH (Puchheim, Germany) (represented by: B. Sorg, D. Wiedemann and M. Ringer, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2019 (Case R 2371/2018 2), relating to opposition proceedings between OmniVision and Olimp Laboratories.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Olimp Laboratories sp z o.o. to pay the costs. |