EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TB0056
Case T-56/13: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — ClientEarth and Stichting BirdLife Europe v European Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Document held by the Commission concerning European Union energy policy — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-56/13: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — ClientEarth and Stichting BirdLife Europe v European Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Document held by the Commission concerning European Union energy policy — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-56/13: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — ClientEarth and Stichting BirdLife Europe v European Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Document held by the Commission concerning European Union energy policy — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 298, 12.10.2013, p. 6–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 298, 12.10.2013, p. 5–6
(HR)
|
12.10.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 298/6 |
Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — ClientEarth and Stichting BirdLife Europe v European Commission
(Case T-56/13) (1)
(Access to documents of the institutions - Document held by the Commission concerning European Union energy policy - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 298/10
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom); and Stichting BirdLife Europe (Zeist, Netherlands) (represented by: O. Brouwer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agent)
Re:
Application for the annulment of the Commission’s implied decision to refuse the applicants access to a document concerning European Union energy policy.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ClientEarth and Stitching BirdLife Europe. |