Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62006TJ0147

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 26 November 2008.
En Route International Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Application for registration of the word mark FRESHHH as a Community trade mark - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Case T-147/06.

European Court Reports 2008 II-00288*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2008:528





Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 26 November 2008 – En Route International v OHIM (FRESHHH)

(Case T-147/06)

Community trade mark – Application for registration of the word mark FRESHHH as a Community trade mark – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 21, 28)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 March 2006 (Case R 352/2005-4) concerning registration of the word sign FRESHHH as a Community trade mark.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

En Route International Ltd

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark FRESHHH for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 32 – Application No 3198165

Decision of the examiner:

Registration refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed


Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders En Route International Ltd to pay the costs.

Top