This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023TO0427
Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 November 2024.
SJ AB v European Commission.
Action for annulment – Directive 2014/25/EU – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Request to establish that Directive 2014/25 does not apply to public procurement in the field of railway passenger transport in Sweden – Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25 – Letter from the Commission requesting additional information – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.
Case T-427/23.
Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 November 2024.
SJ AB v European Commission.
Action for annulment – Directive 2014/25/EU – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Request to establish that Directive 2014/25 does not apply to public procurement in the field of railway passenger transport in Sweden – Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25 – Letter from the Commission requesting additional information – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.
Case T-427/23.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:881
Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 November 2024 –
SJ v Commission
(Case T‑427/23)
(Action for annulment – Directive 2014/25/EU – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Request to establish that Directive 2014/25 does not apply to public procurement in the field of railway passenger transport in Sweden – Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25 – Letter from the Commission requesting additional information – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility)
|
1. |
Action for annulment – Actionable measures – Concept – Measures producing binding legal effects – Purely informative measure – Not included (Art. 263 TFEU) (see paragraphs 15-17) |
|
2. |
Action for annulment – Actionable measures – Concept – Measures producing binding legal effects – Preparatory measures – Not included – Letter from the Commission requesting updated information following an annulment judgment – Inadmissibility (Art. 263 TFEU) (see paragraphs 18, 19, 23-32) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
SJ AB shall pay the costs. |