This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CO0611
Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2023.
Illumina Inc. v European Commission.
Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – European Commission decision to examine a merger referred by the competition authority of a Member State – Commission decision accepting that the initial referral request be joined by other Member States – An association of undertakings active in the relevant sector with the purpose of defending the interests of its members – Allowed.
Case C-611/22 P.
Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2023.
Illumina Inc. v European Commission.
Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – European Commission decision to examine a merger referred by the competition authority of a Member State – Commission decision accepting that the initial referral request be joined by other Member States – An association of undertakings active in the relevant sector with the purpose of defending the interests of its members – Allowed.
Case C-611/22 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:205
Case C‑611/22 P
Illumina, Inc.
v
European Commission
Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2023
(Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – European Commission decision to examine a merger referred by the competition authority of a Member State – Commission decision accepting that the initial referral request be joined by other Member States – An association of undertakings active in the relevant sector with the purpose of defending the interests of its members – Allowed)
-
Judicial proceedings – Intervention – Admissibility criteria – Interest in the result of the case – Concept – Need for a direct and existing interest – Dispute concerning the lawfulness of a Commissioner merger decision
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 40, second para.)
(see paragraphs 5-21)