This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2000/233/19
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 May 2000 in Case C-50/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris): Jean-Marie Podesta v Caisse de Retraite par répartition des Ingénieurs Cadres & Assimilés (CRICA) and Others (Social policy — Equal pay for men and women — Private, inter-occupational, supplementary retirement pension scheme based on defined contributions and run on a "pay-as-you-go" basis— Survivors' pensions for which the age conditions for grant vary according to sex)
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 May 2000 in Case C-50/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris): Jean-Marie Podesta v Caisse de Retraite par répartition des Ingénieurs Cadres & Assimilés (CRICA) and Others (Social policy — Equal pay for men and women — Private, inter-occupational, supplementary retirement pension scheme based on defined contributions and run on a "pay-as-you-go" basis— Survivors' pensions for which the age conditions for grant vary according to sex)
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 May 2000 in Case C-50/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris): Jean-Marie Podesta v Caisse de Retraite par répartition des Ingénieurs Cadres & Assimilés (CRICA) and Others (Social policy — Equal pay for men and women — Private, inter-occupational, supplementary retirement pension scheme based on defined contributions and run on a "pay-as-you-go" basis— Survivors' pensions for which the age conditions for grant vary according to sex)
Ú. v. ES C 233, 12.8.2000, p. 10–10
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)