This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TO0183
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2020.
Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament.
Action for annulment — Institutional law — Amendments to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure — Major interpellations — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Locus standi — Lack of direct concern — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act — Implementing measures — Inadmissibility.
Case T-183/19.
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2020.
Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament.
Action for annulment — Institutional law — Amendments to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure — Major interpellations — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Locus standi — Lack of direct concern — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act — Implementing measures — Inadmissibility.
Case T-183/19.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:111
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2020 –
Jalkh v Parliament
(Case T‑183/19)
(Action for annulment — Institutional law — Amendments to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure — Major interpellations — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Locus standi — Lack of direct concern — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act — Implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
|
1. |
Judicial proceedings — Decision taken by way of reasoned order — Possibility of ruling without an oral procedure (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 129 and 130) (see paras 11, 12) |
|
2. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Absence — Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para. and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paras 15, 16, 18, 19) |
|
3. |
Action for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Regulatory acts — Acts not comprising implementing measures and concerning the applicant directly — Conditions cumulative in nature — Inadmissibility of the action where just one of those conditions not met (Art. 263, fourth para. TFEU) (see paras 22, 25, 27-30) |
|
4. |
Action for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of individual concern to them — Criteria (Art. 263, fourth para. TFEU) (see paras 31-35) |
|
5. |
Action for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Regulatory acts entailing implementing measures — Concept — Criteria for assessment (Art. 263, fourth para. TFEU) (see paras 36, 38-41) |
Re:
Action brought under Article 263 TFUE seeking annulment of Parliament Decision P8_TA(2019)0046 of 31 January 2019 on amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure affecting Chapters 1 and 4 of Title I; Chapter 3 of Title V; Chapters 4 and 5 of Title VII; Chapter 1 of Title VIII; Title XII; Title XIV and Annex II (2018/2170(REG)).
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs. |