This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/178/22
Case C-227/05: Order of the Court of 6 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht München- Germany) — Daniel Halbritter v Freistaat Bayern, represented by the Landesanwaltschaft Bayern (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 91/439/EEC — Mutual recognition of driving licences — Confiscation of driving licence in one Member State accompanied by temporary ban on acquiring a new licence — Licence issued in another Member State after the expiry of the temporary ban — Recognition and exchange of that licence in the first Member State — Presentation of a report on aptitude to drive required by national law)
Case C-227/05: Order of the Court of 6 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht München- Germany) — Daniel Halbritter v Freistaat Bayern, represented by the Landesanwaltschaft Bayern (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 91/439/EEC — Mutual recognition of driving licences — Confiscation of driving licence in one Member State accompanied by temporary ban on acquiring a new licence — Licence issued in another Member State after the expiry of the temporary ban — Recognition and exchange of that licence in the first Member State — Presentation of a report on aptitude to drive required by national law)
Case C-227/05: Order of the Court of 6 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht München- Germany) — Daniel Halbritter v Freistaat Bayern, represented by the Landesanwaltschaft Bayern (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 91/439/EEC — Mutual recognition of driving licences — Confiscation of driving licence in one Member State accompanied by temporary ban on acquiring a new licence — Licence issued in another Member State after the expiry of the temporary ban — Recognition and exchange of that licence in the first Member State — Presentation of a report on aptitude to drive required by national law)
JO C 178, 29.7.2006, p. 13–14
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.7.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 178/13 |
Order of the Court of 6 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht München- Germany) — Daniel Halbritter v Freistaat Bayern, represented by the Landesanwaltschaft Bayern
(Case C-227/05) (1)
(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 91/439/EEC - Mutual recognition of driving licences - Confiscation of driving licence in one Member State accompanied by temporary ban on acquiring a new licence - Licence issued in another Member State after the expiry of the temporary ban - Recognition and exchange of that licence in the first Member State - Presentation of a report on aptitude to drive required by national law)
(2006/C 178/22)
Language of the case: German
National court
Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht München
Parties
Applicant: Daniel Halbritter
Defendant: Freistaat Bayern (represented by the Landesanwaltschaft Bayern)
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht München — Interpretation of Article 1(2) and Article 8(2) and (4) of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences (OJ 1991 L 237, p. 1) — Refusal to recognise the validity or the exchange of a driving licence issued, after the expiry of the temporary ban, by another Member State, against a holder whose national driving licence had been confiscated for driving under the influence of narcotics — Duty to take aptitude tests
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The combined provisions of Article 1(2) and Article 8(2) and (4) of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences, as amended by Council Directive 97/26/EC of 2 June 1997, preclude a Member State from refusing to recognise, within its territory, the right to drive conferred by a driving licence issued in another Member State and, accordingly, the validity of that licence, on the ground that the holder of that licence, whose licence had previously been confiscated within the territory of the first Member State, did not take the test for aptitude to drive required by the law of that State in order for a new licence to be supplied following the confiscation of the previous licence, where the temporary ban on obtaining a new licence imposed at the same time as that confiscation had expired when the driving licence was supplied in the other Member State; |
|
2. |
The combined provisions of Article 1(1) and Article 8(2) and (4) of Council Directive 91/439, as amended by Council Directive 97/26, preclude a Member State, which has received a request, in circumstances such as those in the present case, to exchange a valid driving licence supplied in another Member State for a national driving licence, from making such an exchange subject to the condition that the applicant take a new test of his aptitude to drive, required by the law of the first Member State in order to remove any doubts in that regard by reason of circumstances predating the acquisition of the licence in the other Member State. |