EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 91998E003775
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3775/98 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. The threat to ethical and social values from the commercialisation of death and human cadavers
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3775/98 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. The threat to ethical and social values from the commercialisation of death and human cadavers
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3775/98 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. The threat to ethical and social values from the commercialisation of death and human cadavers
JO C 207, 21.7.1999, p. 127
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)
91998E3775
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3775/98 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. The threat to ethical and social values from the commercialisation of death and human cadavers
Official Journal C 207 , 21/07/1999 P. 0127
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3775/98 by Hiltrud Breyer (V) to the Commission (11 December 1998) Subject: The threat to ethical and social values from the commercialisation of death and human cadavers 1. Would the Commission state its views on the legality (setting aside the ethical aspect) of testators bequeathing their bodies to private plastic surgery clinics? Is it not fair to assume that, as in the case of organs "donated" by people from very poor countries, this form of "donation" is forced upon people by extreme poverty and harsh social conditions (see question 4)? 2. Does the Commission agree that it is against the ethics of the medical profession to "carve up" human cadavers for cosmetic purposes or for use as a commodity? 3. Does the Commission further agree that the exhibition for commercial purposes and sale of whole-body anatomical specimens at so-called "art" exhibitions, on videos or on CD-roms is an affront to the rights and values enshrined in the European Community? 4. Were licences issued for the import of at least three corpses imported into Germany from China, Russia and Kirghizia? 5. Is it consistent with the European Community's position on the universal status of human rights for the corpses of people convicted and executed in China - in circumstances of highly questionable legality - to be used in Europe as a source of body parts, whole-body anatomical specimens or "art" gallery exhibits? 6. How is it possible that, although usually it is prohibited for private individuals to be given charge of human cadavers, in this case no problems seem to have been raised? Answer given by Mr Santer on behalf of the Commission (12 February 1999) The Commission deems that Community law does not offer an adequate legal base to treat this matter. Therefore, the institutions of the European Union are devoid of competence to act in this field. However, the possibility of bringing a case before the European Court of Human Rights cannot be ruled out. Given the high sensitivity of the issues raised by the Honourable Member, the Commission has decided to forward the matter to the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies.