This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61999TO0071
Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 1 June 1999.#Karl L. Meyer v Commission of the European Communities.#Action for annulment and damages - Action manifestly inadmissible and without any foundation in law.#Case T-71/99.
Ordonanța Tribunalului de Primă Instanță (camera a treia) din data de 1 iunie 1999.
Karl L. Meyer împotriva Comisiei Comunităților Europene.
Cauza T-71/99.
Ordonanța Tribunalului de Primă Instanță (camera a treia) din data de 1 iunie 1999.
Karl L. Meyer împotriva Comisiei Comunităților Europene.
Cauza T-71/99.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:1999:115
61999B0071
Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 1 June 1999. - Karl L. Meyer v Commission of the European Communities. - Action for annulment and damages - Action manifestly inadmissible and without any foundation in law. - Case T-71/99.
European Court reports 1999 Page II-01727
Keywords
Actions for annulment - Action contesting a Commission decision refusing emergency aid not provided for under the Community rules - Action manifestly unfounded
(EC Treaty, Art. 173, fourth para. (now, after amendment, Art. 230, fourth para., EC); Fourth ACP-EEC Convention signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989, Art. 366; Council Decision 91//482)
Summary
$$An action must be dismissed as manifestly unfounded where it is brought by a farmer in French Polynesia against a Commission decision refusing him emergency aid which he had requested in order to repair cyclone damage to his plantation. Council Decision 91/482 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Economic Community makes no provision for the Community to grant individuals emergency aid on request in the event of natural disasters. Nor does Article 366 of the Fourth Lomé Convention mention the payment of special emergency aid to individuals established in the territory of one of the ACP States.