Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/310/18

Case T-274/02: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 October 2006 — Ritek and Prodisc Technology v Council (Dumping — Recordable compact discs originating in Taiwan — Determination of the dumping margin — Choice of the asymmetrical method of calculation — Pattern of export prices which differ according to the purchasers, regions or periods — Zeroing technique)

JO C 310, 16.12.2006, p. 11–11 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

16.12.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/11


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 October 2006 — Ritek and Prodisc Technology v Council

(Case T-274/02) (1)

(Dumping - Recordable compact discs originating in Taiwan - Determination of the dumping margin - Choice of the asymmetrical method of calculation - Pattern of export prices which differ according to the purchasers, regions or periods - ‘Zeroing’ technique)

(2006/C 310/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ritek Corp (Hsin-Chu, Taiwan) and Prodisc Technology Inc. (Taipei Hsien, Taiwan) (represented by: first, K. Adamantopoulos, V. Akritidis and D. De Notaris, lawyers, and subsequently by K. Adamantopoulos and J. Branton, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by S. Marquardt, acting as Agent, and G. Berrisch, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by T. Scharf and S. Meany, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2002 of 13 June 2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of recordable compact discs originating in Taiwan (OJ 2002 L 160, p. 2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Ritek Corp. and Prodisc Technology Inc. to bear their own costs and those incurred by the Council;

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs


(1)  OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.


Top