Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/212/53

    Case T-129/06: Action brought on 26 April 2006 — Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret and Akar v Commission

    JO C 212, 2.9.2006, p. 29–30 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    02/09/2006; data publicării
    Author:
    Tribunalul de Primă Instanţă
    Form:
    Informații juridice

    2.9.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 212/29

    Action brought on 26 April 2006 — Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret and Akar v Commission

    (Case T-129/06)

    (2006/C 212/53)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicants: Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi (Cankaya/Ankara, Turkey) and M. Akar (Cankaya/Ankara, Turkey) (represented by: C. Sahin, lawyer)

    Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

    Form of order sought

    —

    Reservation of rights to bring a claim for damages;

    —

    Suspension, as a matter of priority, of implementation of the procedure with regard to the subject-matter of the present proceedings;

    —

    Annulment of the procedure of 23 December 2005 with the number MK/KS/DELTUR/(2005)/SecE/D/1614 which is the subject-matter of the present proceedings;

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The applicants are contesting the decision of the European Commission Delegation in Turkey of 23 December 2005 which was addressed to the applicants with regard to the call for tenders in respect of the construction of educational establishments in the provinces of Diyarbakir and Siirt.

    The applicants submit, inter alia, that their tender was the lowest and that the file in respect thereof was complete and therefore the contract should have been awarded to them. Furthermore, they submit that the contested decision infringes European Union law.

    Top