Case T-361/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Peek & Cloppenburg and van Graaf v OHIM — Queen Sirikit Institute of Sericulture (Thai Silk) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark Thai Silk — Earlier national figurative trade mark representing a winged creature — Admissibility of the action — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

Kawża T-361/08: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tal- 21 ta’ April 2010 — Peek & Cloppenburg u van Graaf vs UASI — Queen Sirikit Institute of Sericulture (Thai Silk) ( “Trade mark Komunitarja — Proċedimenti ta’ oppożizzjoni — Applikazzjoni għat-trade mark Komunitarja figurattiva Thai Silk — Trade mark nazzjonali figurattiva preċedenti li tirrapreżenta għasfur — Ammissibbiltà tar-rikors — Raġuni relattiva għal rifjut — Probabbiltà ta’ konfużjoni — Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 40/94 (li sar l-Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009)” )

Kawża T-361/08: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tal- 21 ta’ April 2010 — Peek & Cloppenburg u van Graaf vs UASI — Queen Sirikit Institute of Sericulture (Thai Silk) ( “Trade mark Komunitarja — Proċedimenti ta’ oppożizzjoni — Applikazzjoni għat-trade mark Komunitarja figurattiva Thai Silk — Trade mark nazzjonali figurattiva preċedenti li tirrapreżenta għasfur — Ammissibbiltà tar-rikors — Raġuni relattiva għal rifjut — Probabbiltà ta’ konfużjoni — Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 40/94 (li sar l-Artikolu 8(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009)” )

ĠU C 148, 5.6.2010, p. 28–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)