This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 02003D0828-20041116
Commission Decision of 25 November 2003 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue (notified under document number C(2003) 4335) (Text with EEA relevance) (2003/828/EC)
Consolidated text: Commission Decision of 25 November 2003 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue (notified under document number C(2003) 4335) (Text with EEA relevance) (2003/828/EC)
Commission Decision of 25 November 2003 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue (notified under document number C(2003) 4335) (Text with EEA relevance) (2003/828/EC)
No longer in force
2003D0828 — EN — 16.11.2004 — 003.001
This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
|
COMMISSION DECISION of 25 November 2003 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue (notified under document number C(2003) 4335) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 311, 27.11.2003, p.41) |
Amended by:
|
|
|
Official Journal |
||
|
No |
page |
date |
||
|
L 7 |
47 |
13.1.2004 |
||
|
L 189 |
27 |
27.5.2004 |
||
|
L 244 |
51 |
16.7.2004 |
||
|
L 337 |
70 |
13.11.2004 |
||
COMMISSION DECISION
of 25 November 2003
on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue
(notified under document number C(2003) 4335)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2003/828/EC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000 laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue ( 1 ), and in particular Article 8(2)(d), Article 8(3), Article 9(1)(c), and the third paragraph of Article 19 thereof,
Whereas:|
(1) |
Commission Decision 2003/218/EC of 27 March 2003 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue and on rules applicable to movements of animals in and from those zones and repealing Decision 2001/783/EC ( 2 ), as amended by Decision 2003/535/EC ( 3 ), was adopted in the light of the bluetongue situation prevailing in the early months of 2003. That Decision demarcates protection and surveillance zones corresponding to specific epidemiological situations and lays down the conditions for providing exemptions from the ban on the movements of animals in and from those zones. |
|
(2) |
In view of the evolution of the situation, and in particular the isolation of a new serotype in Sardinia and Corsica (serotype 4) and a new incursion of serotype 2 in the Balearic Islands, the global geographic areas where protection and surveillance zones are to be established should be reconsidered. |
|
(3) |
Five global ‘restriction zones’ should be distinguished on the basis of the serotype(s) isolated: Balearic Islands and northern continental Italy (serotype 2 only), Sardinia and Corsica (serotypes 2 and 4), southern continental Italy (serotypes 2 and 9 and to a lesser extent 4 and 16), and two zones for Greece where different serotypes have been isolated in different localities during the previous years. |
|
(4) |
Pursuant to a request made by Greece, it is appropriate to establish a distinction between the continental part of the territory of that Member State, from which exemptions from the exit ban may be implemented with regard to intra-Community trade, and the rest of the territory where such exemptions should be limited to domestic movements only. |
|
(5) |
In view of the prohibition of vaccination in surveillance zones laid down in Directive 2000/75/EC, and of the evolution of the epidemiological situation on the ground, it is appropriate to leave the demarcation between protection and surveillance zones to be decided by the competent authority of the Member States concerned. |
|
(6) |
Exemptions from the exit ban applicable to movements of animals from protection and surveillance zones should be authorised on a risk-analysis approach taking into account the data collected through the surveillance programme on the virus activity at the place of origin, the destination of the animals, and their vaccination status. |
|
(7) |
It is appropriate to provide for the conditions under which the transit of animals through the protection and surveillance zones should take place. |
|
(8) |
For the sake of clarity of Community legislation it is appropriate to repeal Decision 2003/218/EC and to replace it by this Decision. |
|
(9) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Subject matter
The purpose of this Decision is to demarcate the global geographic areas where protection and surveillance zones (‘restricted zones’) shall be established by the Member states as provided for in Article 8(1) of Directive 2000/75/EC.
Its purpose is also to set out the conditions for exempting from the exit ban laid down in Article 9(1)(c) and Article 10(1) of Directive 2000/75/EC (the exit ban) certain movements of animals, their sperm, ova and embryos, from those zones and through those zones (transit).
This Decision shall not affect movements inside the restricted zones referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 2(1), except where otherwise provided.
Article 2
Demarcation of restricted zones
1. Restricted zones A, B, C, D, E and F shall be demarcated as set out in Annex I.
Exemptions from the exit ban for those zones shall only take place in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Decision.
In the case of the restricted zone F set out in Annex I, movements of live animals of species susceptible to bluetongue from a territory of Spain to Portugal shall be prohibited unless authorised by the competent authorities.
2. In the case of Greece, the exit ban shall apply for domestic movements from zone E to zone D only as set out in Annex I.
Article 3
Exemption from the exit ban for domestic movements
1. Domestic dispatches of animals, their sperm, ova and embryos, from a restricted zone set out in Annex I shall be exempted from the exit ban provided that the animals, their sperm, ova and embryos comply with the conditions set out in Annex II or, in the case of Spain, France and Italy, that they comply with paragraph 2 or in the case of Greece that they comply with paragraph 3.
2. In Spain, France and Italy, domestic dispatches as provided for in paragraph 1 shall be exempted from the exit ban by the competent authority if:
(a) the animals originate from a herd vaccinated according to the programme adopted by the competent authority;
(b) the animals have been vaccinated more than 30 days and less than one year before the date of dispatch against the serotype(s) present or possibly present in an epidemiologically relevant area of origin;
(c) the vector surveillance programme in an epidemiologically relevant area of destination has proved no adult Culicoïdes imicola activity.
3. In Greece domestic dispatches as provided for in paragraph 1 shall also be exempted from the exit ban by the competent authority if:
(a) the animals have been serologically tested (BT ELISA or AGID) with a negative result within 72 hours prior to time of dispatch; and
(b) the animals have been sprayed with insect repellent with a remnant effect of more than four days on the occasion of the sampling.
4. A channelling procedure shall be set up, under the control of the competent authority, preventing any further movement to another Member State of animals moved under the conditions provided for in this Article.
Article 4
Exemption from the exit ban for domestic movements for slaughter
Dispatches of animals from a restricted zone for immediate slaughter within one Member State may be exempted from the exit ban by the competent authority if:
(a) a case-by-case risk assessment on the possible contact between animals and the vectors during transport to the slaughterhouse is made, taking into consideration:
(i) the data available through the surveillance programme on the vector's activity;
(ii) the distance from the point of entry in the non-restricted zone to the slaughterhouse;
(iii) the entomological data on the route referred to in point (ii);
(iv) the period of the day during which the transport takes place in relation to the hours of activity of the vectors;
(v) the possible use of insecticides in compliance with Council Directive 96/23/EC ( 4 );
(b) the animals to be moved do not show any sign of bluetongue on the day of transport;
(c) the animals are transported in vehicles sealed by the competent authority and directly to the slaughterhouse for the purpose of immediate slaughter, under official supervision;
(d) the competent authority responsible for the slaughterhouse is informed of the intention to send animals to it and notifies the dispatching competent authority of their arrival.
Article 5
Exemption from the exit ban for animals leaving the restricted zones for intra-Community trade
1. Dispatches of animals, their sperm ova and embryos, from restricted zones A, B, C and D as set out in Annex I shall be exempted from the exit ban for intra-Community trade by the competent authority only if:
(a) the animals, their sperm ova and embryos comply with the conditions laid down in Article 3; and
(b) the Member State of destination gives its prior approval.
2. The Member State of origin availing itself of the exemption provided for in paragraph 1 shall ensure that the following additional wording is added to the corresponding health certificates laid down in Council Directives 64/432/EEC ( 5 ), 88/407/EEC ( 6 ), 89/556/EEC ( 7 ), 91/68/EEC ( 8 ) and 92/65/EEC ( 9 ):
‘animals/semen/ova/embryos ( 10 ) in compliance with Decision 2003/828/EC.
Article 6
Transit of animals through a restricted zone
1. The transit of animals dispatched from an area of the Community outside the restricted zones set out in Annex I through a restricted zone set out in that Annex, shall be authorised if an insecticide treatment of the animals and of the means of transport be carried out at the place of loading or in any case prior to entering the restricted zone.
When during transit through a restricted zone, a rest period is foreseen in a staging post, an insecticide treatment shall be carried out in order to protect animals from any attack by vectors.
2. In case of intra-Community trade, the transit shall be subject to the authorisation of the competent authorities of the Member State of transit and the Member State of destination, and the following additional wording shall be added to the corresponding health certificates laid down in Directives 64/432/EEC, 91/68/EEC and 92/65/EEC:
‘Insecticide treatment with (name of the product) on (date) at (time) in conformity with Decision 2003/828/EC.’
Article 7
Implementation measures
The Member States shall amend the measures they apply to trade so as to bring them into compliance with this Decision and they shall give immediate appropriate publicity to the measures adopted. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
Article 8
Repeal
Decision 2003/218/EC is repealed. References made to the repealed Decision shall be construed as references to this Decision.
Article 9
Applicability
This Decision shall apply from 17 December 2003.
Article 10
Addressees
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
ANNEX I
(Restricted zones: geographic areas where protection and surveillance zones shall be established by the Member States)
Zone A (serotypes 2 and 9 and, to a lesser extent, 4 and 16)
Italy
|
Abruzzo |
: |
Chieti, all Municipalities belonging to the Local Health Unit of Avezzano-Sulmona |
|
Basilicata |
: |
Matera, and Potenza |
|
Calabria |
: |
Catanzaro, Cosenza, Crotone, Reggio Calabria, Vibo Valentia |
|
Campania |
: |
Caserta, Benevento, Avellino, Napoli, Salerno |
|
Lazio |
: |
Frosinone, Latina |
|
Molise |
: |
Isernia, Campobasso |
|
Puglia |
: |
Foggia, Bari, Lecce, Taranto, Brindisi |
|
Sicilia |
: |
Agrigento, Catania, Caltanissetta, Enna, Messina, Palermo, Ragusa, Siracusa and Trapani |
Malta ( 11 )
Zone B (serotype 2)
Italy
|
Abruzzo |
: |
L’Aquila with the exception of all Municipalities belonging to the Local Health Unit of Avezzano-Sulmona |
|
Lazio |
: |
Viterbo, Roma, Rieti |
|
Marche |
: |
Ascoli Piceno, Macerata |
|
Toscana |
: |
Massa Carrara, Pisa, Grosseto, Livorno |
|
Umbria |
: |
Terni and Perugia |
Zone C (serotypes 2 and 4 and, to a lesser extent, 16)
Spain
Islas Baleares
France
Corse du sud, Haute-Corse
Italy
|
Sardinia |
: |
Cagliari, Nuoro, Sassari, Oristano |
Zone D
Greece
The entire Greek territory with the exception of prefectorates listed in Zone E
Zone E
Greece
Dodekanisi, Samos, Chios and Lesvos prefectorates
Cyprus (11)
Zone F
Spain
— Province of Cádiz, Málaga, Sevilla, Huelva, Córdoba, Jaén, Cáceres, Badajoz,
— Province of Toledo (comarcas of Oropesa, Talavera de la Reina, Belvis de Jara and Los Navalmorales),
— Province of Ciudad Real (comarcas of Horcajo de los Montes, Piedrabuena, Almadén and Almodóvar del Campo).
Portugal
— Regional Direction of Agriculture of Alentejo: concelhos of Niza, Castelo de Vide, Marvão, Ponte de Sor, Crato, Portoalegre, Alter do Chão, Avis, Mora, Sousel, Fronteira, Monforte, Arronches, Campo Maior, Elvas, Arraiolos, Estremoz, Borba, Vila Viçosa, Alandroal, Redondo, Évora, Portel, Reguengos de Monsaraz, Mourão, Moura, Barrancos; Mértola, Serpa, Beja, Vidigueira, Ferreira do Alentejo, Cuba, Alvito, Viana, Montemor-o-Novo, Vendas Novas, Alcácer do Sal (East of A2, the freguesias of Santa Susana, Santiago and Torrão) Gavião (feguesias of Gavião, Atalaia, Margem and Comenda),
— Regional Direction of Agriculture do Ribatejo e Oeste: concelhos of Montijo (freguesias of Canha, S. Isidoro de Pegões and Pegões), Coruche, Salvaterra de Magos, Almeirim, Alpiarça, Chamusca, (freguesias of Pinheiro Grande, Chamusca, Ulme, Vale de Cavalos, Chouto and Parreira), Constância (freguesia of Sta Margarida de Coutada), Abrantes (freguesias of Tramagal, S. Miguel do Rio Torto, Rossio ao Sul do Tejo, Pego, Concovoadas, Alvega, S. Facundo, Vale das Mós and Bemposta).
ANNEX II
A. Live animals must have been:
1. protected from Culicoides attack for at least 100 days prior to shipment; or
2. protected from Culicoides attack for at least 28 days prior to shipment, and subjected during that period to a serological test to detect antibodies to the BTV group, such as the BT competition ELISA or the BT AGID test, with negative results on two occasions, with an interval of not less than seven days between each test, the first test being carried out at least 21 days after introduction into the quarantine station; or
3. protected from Culicoides attack for at least 14 days prior to shipment, and subjected during that period to a BTV isolation test or polymerase chain reaction test, with negative results, on blood samples taken on two occasions, with an interval of not less than seven days between each test, the first test being carried out at least seven days after introduction into the quarantine station; and
4. protected from Culicoides attack during transportation to the place of shipment.
B. Semen must have been obtained from donors, which have been:
1. protected from Culicoides attack for at least 100 days before commencement of, and during, collection of the semen; or
2. subjected to a serological test to detect antibodies to the BTV group such as the BT competition ELISA or the BT AGID test, with negative results, at least every 60 days throughout the collection period and between 28 and 60 days after the final collection for this consignment; or
3. subjected to a virus isolation test or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test on blood samples collected at commencement and conclusion of, and at least every seven days (virus isolation test) or at least every 28 days (PCR test) during, semen collection for this consignment, with negative results.
C. Ova and embryos must have been obtained from donors, which have been:
1. protected from Culicoides attack for at least 100 days before commencement of and during, collection of the embryos/ova; or
2. subjected to a serological test to detect antibodies to the BTV group such as the BT competition ELISA or the BT AGID test, between 28 and 60 days after collection with negative results; or
3. subjected to a BTV isolation test or polymerase chain reaction test on a blood sample taken on the day of collection, with negative results.
( 1 ) OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 74.
( 2 ) OJ L 82, 29.3.2003, p. 35.
( 3 ) OJ L 184, 23.7.2003, p. 40.
( 4 ) OJ L 125, 23.5.1996, p. 10.
( 5 ) OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977.
( 6 ) OJ L 194, 22.7.1988, p. 10.
( 7 ) OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1.
( 8 ) OJ L 46, 19.2.1991, p. 19.
( 9 ) OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 54.
( 10 ) Delete as appropriate.’
( 11 ) Transitional animal health status for Cyprus and Malta, pending the analysis of epidemiological data; status to be reviewed at the latest by 1 May 2007.