EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 92002E003597

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3597/02 by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission. EU funding to deal with the economic, social and ecological consequences of the Prestige disaster for the Galician coastline.

OV C 242E, 9.10.2003, p. 64–64 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

92002E3597

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3597/02 by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission. EU funding to deal with the economic, social and ecological consequences of the Prestige disaster for the Galician coastline.

Official Journal 242 E , 09/10/2003 P. 0064 - 0064


WRITTEN QUESTION E-3597/02

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(13 December 2002)

Subject: EU funding to deal with the economic, social and ecological consequences of the Prestige disaster for the Galician coastline

What specific and additional EU financial resources will be allocated to dealing with the economic, social and ecological consequences of the Prestige disaster? Will recourse be had to the Solidarity Fund which was created following the natural disasters in Germany and Austria? Will an additional fund be created if necessary? Will there be full and swift compensation for the economic losses suffered, not only by the activities directly affected but also by all the other economic operators related to those activities?

Joint answerto Written Questions E-3597/02 and E-3598/02given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(26 February 2003)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its answers to parliamentary questions H-0848/02(1), E-3362/02 and E-3404/02(2), E-3439/02(3), E-3590/02(4), E-3591/02(5), E-3593/02(6), E-3594/02(7), E-3599/02(11), E-3602/02, E-3603/02 and E-3604/02(8), E-3655/02 and E-3656/02(9) and P-0001/03(10), which cover all aspects of the Prestige disaster, including the issues of compensation and costs raised by the Honourable Member.

(1) Written answer given on 14.1.2003.

(2) OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 85.

(3) OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 90.

(4) OJ C 222 E, 18.9.2003, p. 91.

(5) OJ C 222 E, 18.9.2003, p. 92.

(6) OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 110.

(7) OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 111.

(8) OJ C 192 E, 14.8.2003, p. 124.

(9) OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 123.

(10) OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 166.

(11) OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 111.

Top