EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/106/131

Order of the court of first instance of 9 February2004 in Case T-120/03 Synopharm G,bH & Co. KG v Officefor Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Communitytrade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

OL C 106, 2004 4 30, p. 64–64 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

30.4.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/64


ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 February 2004

in Case T-120/03 Synopharm G,bH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2004/C 106/131)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-120/03 between Synopharm GmbH & Co. KG, represented by G. Hodapp, lawyer, and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and U. Pfleghar), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being Pentafarma – Sociedad Técnico-Medicinal Lda, represented by J. Pereira da Cruz, lawyer – Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 January 2003 (Case R 44/2002-3) relating to the opposition proceedings between Synopharm GmbH & Co. KG and Pentafarma – Sociedad Técnico-Medicinal Lda – the Court of first instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 February 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

There is no need to rule on the action;

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each pay half of those incurred by the defendant.


(1)  OJ 2003 C 171.


Top