Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 61989CC0018

Lenz főtanácsnok indítványa, az ismertetés napja: 1990. március 7.
Maizena GmbH kontra Hauptzollamt Krefeld.
Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem: Bundesfinanzhof - Németország.
Mezőgazdaság.
C-18/89. sz. ügy

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1990:104

61989C0018

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered on 7 March 1990. - Maizena GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesfinanzhof - Germany. - Agriculture - Production refunds - Art. 5a of Regulation (EEC) nº 2742/75 - Isoglucose used in the production of sorbitol. - Case C-18/89.

European Court reports 1990 Page I-02587
Pub.RJ Page Pub somm


Opinion of the Advocate-General


++++

Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered his Opinion on 7 March 1990 . (*) He proposed that the Court should rule as follows :

"Article 5a(1 ) of Regulation ( EEC ) No 2742/75, as amended by Regulation ( EEC ) No 1665/77, did not, at the time with which the main proceedings are concerned, preclude the granting of production refunds for products destined for the manufacture of isoglucose, provided that the isoglucose was to be used as an intermediate product, not intended for marketing, in the manufacture of sorbitol ."

Top