EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/155/30

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 April 2005 in Case T-211/03 Faber Chimica Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Application for figurative mark Faber — Opposition of the proprietor of the national word and figurative marks NABER — Refusal of registration)

SL C 155, 25.6.2005, p. 15–16 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

25.6.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/15


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 April 2005

in Case T-211/03 Faber Chimica Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for figurative mark Faber - Opposition of the proprietor of the national word and figurative marks NABER - Refusal of registration)

(2005/C 155/30)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-211/03: Faber Chimica Srl, established in Fabriano (Italy), represented by P. Tartuferi and M. Andreano, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: M. Capostagno and O. Montalto), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Industrias Quimicas Naber, SA Nabersa, established in Valencia (Spain) — action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 March 2003 (Case R 620/2001-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Faber Chimica Srl and Industrias Quimicas Naber, SA Nabersa — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 20 April 2005, in which it:

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 March 2003 (Case R 620/2001-4) in so far as it upholds the opposition of the proprietor of the Spanish word mark NABER;

2.

Orders the defendant to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 200, 23.8.2003.


Top