EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TN0259
Case T-259/12: Action brought on 11 June 2012 — Alban Giacomo v Commission
Case T-259/12: Action brought on 11 June 2012 — Alban Giacomo v Commission
Case T-259/12: Action brought on 11 June 2012 — Alban Giacomo v Commission
SL C 227, 28.7.2012, p. 33–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
28.7.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 227/33 |
Action brought on 11 June 2012 — Alban Giacomo v Commission
(Case T-259/12)
2012/C 227/55
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Alban Giacomo SpA (Romano d’Ezzelino, Italy) (represented by: S. Nanni Costa, F. Di Gianni, G. Coppo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
Annul or, in the alternative, reduce the fine imposed on the applicant, if necessary by having recourse to the unlimited jurisdiction conferred on the Court by Article 261 TFEU; |
— |
Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The decision contested in the present proceedings is the same as that in Case T-248/12 Carl Fuhr GmbH & C. KG v Commission.
The applicant relies on two pleas in law in support of its action.
1. |
First plea, alleging that the determination of the duration of the infringement ascribed to Alban Giacomo SpA was unlawful.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the fine imposed on Alban Giacomo SpA is unlawful, in so far as it is contrary to the principle that penalties must be specific to the offender and to the offence and the principles of non-discrimination, equal treatment and proportionality.
|