Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/155/33

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 April 2005 in Case T-318/03 Atomic Austria GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Word mark ATOMIC BLITZ — Opposition of the proprietor of national word marks ATOMIC — Evidence of renewal of registration of the earlier mark — Scope of the examination conducted by OHIM — Rejection of opposition — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

SL C 155, 25.6.2005, p. 17–17 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

25.6.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/17


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 April 2005

in Case T-318/03 Atomic Austria GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark - Word mark ATOMIC BLITZ - Opposition of the proprietor of national word marks ATOMIC - Evidence of renewal of registration of the earlier mark - Scope of the examination conducted by OHIM - Rejection of opposition - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 155/33)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-318/03: Atomic Austria GmbH, established in Altenmarkt (Austria), represented by G. Kucsko and C. Schumacher, lawyers, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and B. Müller), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal having been Fabricas Agrupadas de Muñecas de Onil, SA, established in Onil (Spain) — action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2003 (Case R 95/2003-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Atomic Austria GmbH and Fabricas Agrupadas de Muñecas de Onil, SA, — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and I. Pelikánová, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 20 April 2005, in which it:

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 July 2003 (Case R 95/2003-2);

2.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 304 of 13.12.2003.


Top