This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TB0083
Case T-83/12: Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Chico’s Brands Investments v OHIM — Artsana (CHICO’S) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-83/12: Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Chico’s Brands Investments v OHIM — Artsana (CHICO’S) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-83/12: Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Chico’s Brands Investments v OHIM — Artsana (CHICO’S) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
SL C 273, 8.9.2012, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.9.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 273/10 |
Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Chico’s Brands Investments v OHIM — Artsana (CHICO’S)
(Case T-83/12) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 273/17
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Chico’s Brands Investments, Inc. (Fort Myers, United States) (represented by: T. Holman, solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Artsana SpA (Grandate, Italy)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2011 (Case R 2084/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Artsana SpA and Chico’s Brands Investments, Inc.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
Each party is to bear its own costs. |