EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TN0668
Case T-668/11: Action brought on 30 December 2011 — VIP Car Solutions v Parliament
Case T-668/11: Action brought on 30 December 2011 — VIP Car Solutions v Parliament
Case T-668/11: Action brought on 30 December 2011 — VIP Car Solutions v Parliament
SL C 109, 14.4.2012, p. 14–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.4.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 109/14 |
Action brought on 30 December 2011 — VIP Car Solutions v Parliament
(Case T-668/11)
2012/C 109/33
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: VIP Car Solutions SARL (Hoenheim, France) (represented by: G. Welzer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
order the European Parliament to pay EUR 1 408 000 to SARL VIP CAR SOLUTIONS; |
— |
order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant seeks compensation for the material and non-material damage which it claims to have suffered as a result of the Parliament’s decision of 24 January 2007 to reject its tender submitted in the context of a tender procedure relating to transport for Members of the European Parliament in chauffeur-driven cars and minibuses during part-sessions in Strasbourg (PE/2006/06/UTD/1). (1) That decision was annulled by the judgment in Case T-89/07 VIP Car Solutions v Parliament. (2)
In support of the action, the applicant alleges serious fault on the part of the Parliament as follows, giving rise to loss:
— |
a breach of the obligation to notify the price offered by the successful tenderer; |
— |
a breach of the obligation to state reasons, since the Parliament failed to give any information on the characteristics and relative advantages of the successful tender, and |
— |
a manifest error of assessment, since the Parliament did not base its refusal decision on selection and award criteria defined in advance in the documents relating to the call for tenders. |
(1) OJ 2006/S 177-187988.
(2) [2009] ECR II-1403.