Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CJ0088

    Presuda Suda (sedmo vijeće) od 10. studenog 2011.
    LG Electronics, Inc. protiv Ureda za usklađivanje na unutarnjem tržištu (žigovi i dizajni) (OHIM).
    Žalba - Žig Zajednice.
    Predmet C-88/11 P.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:727





    Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 November 2011 – LG Electronics v OHIM

    (Case C‑88/11 P)

    Appeal – Community trade mark – Word sign ‘KOMPRESSOR PLUS’ – Refusal to register – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 7(1)(c) – Descriptive character – Consideration of new evidence by the General Court – Distortion of the facts and evidence

    1.                     Community trade mark – Procedural provisions – Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion – Scope – No obligation to prove matters of common knowledge – Issue before the General Court – Documents produced in order to substantiate the accuracy of a fact of common knowledge (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 74(1)) (see paras 26-30)

    2.                     Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 36-37)

    Re:

    Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2010 in Case T-497/09 LG Electronics v OHIM dismissing the appellant’s action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2009 (Case R 397/2009-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign KOMPRESSOR PLUS as a Community trade mark – Descriptive nature of the mark – Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) – Consideration of new facts by the General Court – Distortion of the evidence.

    Operative part

     

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders LG Electronics Inc. to pay the costs.

    Top