Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010TN0370

Case T-370/10: Action brought on 30 August 2010 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission

SL C 288, 23.10.2010, p. 62–62 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

23.10.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/62

Action brought on 30 August 2010 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission

(Case T-370/10)

()

(2010/C 288/111)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Rubinetterie Teorema SpA (Flero, Brescia, Italy) (represented by: R. Cavani, lawyer, M. Di Muro, lawyer, P. Preda, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

—

Annul Decision C(2010) 4185 of 23 June 2010;

—

In the alternative, impose a token fine;

—

In the further alternative, substantially reduce the fine imposed by the decision to such amount as the Court deems appropriate;

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision contested in these proceedings is the same as that contested in Case T-368/10 Rubinetteria Cisal v Commission.

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in that case.

In particular, the applicant alleges:

—

Infringement of the rights of the defence in relation to Teorema and the consequent invalidity of the decision owing to:

—

the delay in communicating to Teorema the accusations made by the Commission;

—

the difficulties in accessing the file and the lack of an adequate extension of the time-limits;

—

The fact that there is no agreement whose purpose or effect is to prevent, restrict or distort competition and/or no adverse effects on Community trade, and

—

The incorrect assessment of the evidence relating to the alleged involvement of Teorema in Euroitalia’s meetings.
Top