This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0013
Case T-13/10: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Goutier v OHIM — Rauch (ARANTAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to give judgment)
Case T-13/10: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Goutier v OHIM — Rauch (ARANTAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to give judgment)
Case T-13/10: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Goutier v OHIM — Rauch (ARANTAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to give judgment)
SL C 282, 24.9.2011, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.9.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 282/19 |
Order of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Goutier v OHIM — Rauch (ARANTAX)
(Case T-13/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to give judgment)
2011/C 282/37
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Klaus Goutier (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: E.E. Happe, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by B. Schmidt and then by B. Schmidt and R. Pethke, agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Norbert Rauch (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 November 2009 (Case R 1796/2008-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Norbert Rauch and Klaus Goutier.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to give judgment in the action. |
|
2. |
The applicant is ordered to bear his own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The intervener will bear his own costs. |