This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TA0174
Case T-174/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (A with two rectangular motifs) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — International registration covering the European Community — Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs — Earlier national word mark A — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-174/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (A with two rectangular motifs) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — International registration covering the European Community — Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs — Earlier national word mark A — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-174/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (A with two rectangular motifs) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — International registration covering the European Community — Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs — Earlier national word mark A — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
SL C 319, 29.10.2011, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.10.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 319/18 |
Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (A with two rectangular motifs)
(Case T-174/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - International registration covering the European Community - Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs - Earlier national word mark A - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 319/36
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: ara AG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented initially by M. Gial, then by M. Gial and H. Pernez, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Allrounder SARL (Sarrebourg, France) (represented by: N. Boespflug, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 January 2010 (Case R 481/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between ara AG and Allrounder SARL.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders ara AG to pay the costs. |