Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010CN0097

    Case C-97/10, Case C-98/10, Case C-99/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (France) lodged on 22 February 2010 — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Bourdil — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Baba-Pom’

    SL C 113, 1.5.2010, p. 29–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.5.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 113/29


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (France) lodged on 22 February 2010 — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Bourdil — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Baba-Pom’

    ((Case C-97/10) - (Case C-98/10) - (Case C-99/10))

    2010/C 113/45

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (Landes)

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: AG2R Prévoyance

    Defendants: SARL Bourdil, SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie, SARL Baba-Pom’

    Question referred

    Does an extensive collective agreement granting an exclusive right to the management of a single scheme for the supplementary reimbursement of healthcare costs (in this case, to AG2R Prévoyance) infringe the provisions of Article 82 of the EC Treaty where that agreement does not provide for and even expressly excludes any waiver of affiliation to that scheme (in so far as the Community competition rules do not obstruct the performance of the tasks assigned to AG2R Prévoyance, entrusted with the scheme)?


    Top