Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62009CN0359

    Case C-359/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Hungary) lodged on 7 September 2009 — Dr. Donat Cornelius Ebert v Budapesti Ügyvédi Kamara

    SL C 312, 19.12.2009, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.12.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 312/13

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Hungary) lodged on 7 September 2009 — Dr. Donat Cornelius Ebert v Budapesti Ügyvédi Kamara

    (Case C-359/09)

    2009/C 312/20

    Language of the case: Hungarian

    Referring court

    Fővárosi Ítélőtábla

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Dr. Donat Cornelius Ebert

    Defendant: Budapesti Ügyvédi Kamara

    Questions referred

    1.

    Can Council Directive 89/48/EEC (1) and Directive 98/5/EC (2) of the Parliament and of the Council be interpreted as meaning that the applicant, a German citizen licensed to practise law in Germany where he is a member of the Bar Association, but who has a permit to live and work in Hungary, has the right to use, in legal and administrative proceedings, the title ‘ügyvéd’ (lawyer), which is the official title in the host Member State (Hungary), in addition to the German title ‘Rechtsanwalt’ (lawyer) and the Hungarian title ‘európaiközösségi jogász’ (Community lawyer), in spite of the fact that he is not admitted to the Bar Association in Hungary and has not obtained any form of authorisation?

    2.

    Does Directive 98/5/EC supplement Directive 89/4[8]/EEC in the sense that Directive 98/5/EC on the practice of the profession of lawyer constitutes a special law on the legal profession, whereas Directive 89/4[8]/EEC merely regulates in a general manner the recognition of higher-education diplomas?

    (1)  Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16).

    (2)  Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained (OJ 1998 L 77, p. 36).

    Top